Exercise as Medicine: Don't Forget Your Daily Dose!
Exercise is a powerful tool that has been shown in numerous studies to delay the progression of Parkinson’s disease and to even improve existing symptoms. As more research is performed and more sophisticated tools are used to analyze the effects of exercise, it is becoming more and more evident that everyone with PD should be exercising!
In an attempt to help
spread the word on the benefits of exercise, we will be presenting a series of
blogs that go into detail on this topic. In this initial discussion, we will introduce
the top 10 reasons why individuals with Parkinson’s disease should exercise and
elaborate on the #1 REASON for individuals to exercise. Stay tuned to the upcoming blogs as we will be
going into more detail and presenting the latest research regarding these 10 benefits
of exercise!
Here
are the TOP 10 reasons why everyone with PD should get moving…
10. Exercise helps your
muscles and joints loosen up so you can Move Better
9. Exercise helps your brain use dopamine better –
both the dopamine you are naturally producing and the dopamine in your
medication - so you may have a Better Response
to Medication
8. Exercise has been shown
to Decrease
Tremor
7. Exercise improves your Balance,
which prevents falls
6. Exercise improves your Mood,
which can prevent depression
5. Exercise improves Digestion,
which helps prevent constipation
4. Exercise helps you Sleep Better
3. Exercise gives you More Energy to last through the
day doing things you enjoy
2. Exercise improves your Thinking and Memory
1. Exercise may help delay the progression of PD
through Neuroplasticity!
Reason
#1: NEUROPLASTICITY
Neuroplasticity is
the process by which the brain adapts to new experiences and modifies the
current circuitry to “learn” a new behavior. Exercise is one key that allows
your brain to make important changes. This process can be identified
scientifically by words such as neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, neuronal
sprouting, etc. In reality, it does a
large variety of things. Neuroplasticity can refer to small scale changes, such
as those on a cellular level, and also to large scale changes that involve
cortical remapping.
One of the
revolutionary studies that made the connection of behavioral interventions
leading to positive neuroplastic changes was performed by Randolph Nudo in
1996. In this study, Nudo and colleagues
were able to map out the area in the brain that functioned to control various
body parts, but in particular- the fingers, hands, and arms. Then the
researchers induced a very small lesion in the brain, similar to a small
stroke, which lead to impaired hand movement. Subsequently, they provided
skilled training that required the monkey to learn to use its hand again. Nudo and colleagues then re-mapped the same
area of the brain in both the monkeys that had hand training and those that did
not. It turns out that the monkeys that were challenged with the task of
getting a small item (pellet) out of a jar using their hand had significant
more representation of their hand in the area that surrounded the infarct. The
results of this study suggests that when areas of the brain become injured that
the “real estate” that surrounds the injuries can be used to take over function
and ultimately lead to recovery.
In a subsequent study
by Plautz et al. 2000, they compared the results of a very similarly designed
study, but they used two different methods of hand training. One group of
monkey’s were required to get a small pellet out of a large jar, which was
relatively simple and did not require the monkey to “learn a new skill”. In contrast the other group of monkeys were
required to get a small pellet out of a small jar. This required the monkey’s to make multiple
failed attempts and to figure out how to best accomplish the task. When the
cortical mapping was reevaluated, the group of monkeys that practiced getting
the pellet out of the large jar did not show any task related cortical changes,
and the group of monkeys that were given a more challenging task showed
neuroplastic changes. Therefore, the
results of the study suggest that if an exercise is too easy, it might not lead
to the necessary changes in the brain for recovery.
These studies
highlight the importance of picking the right type of exercise to drive Neuroplasticity. Here are some other
factors to take into consideration and questions to ask yourself when choosing
the right type of exercise for you…and YOUR BRAIN!
Principles
to Drive Neuroplasticity:
1.
Difficulty
Matters
a.
Does the activity or exercise program
challenge you?
2.
Intensity
Matters
a.
Are you constantly making your exercise
activity harder overtime?
3.
Specificity
Matters
a.
Are you challenging the parts or
movements of your body that you want to see the most improvements?
4.
Repetition
Matters
a.
Are you practicing your task frequently
enough or for enough repetitions that you see improvement overtime?
5.
Time
Matters
a.
Are you being proactive about your
health and taking steps to prevent symptoms from coming on?
6.
Salience
Matters
a.
Are the activities you are doing
meaningful to you?
The fact is that there are multiple
forms of exercise that have been shown to provide benefits to individuals with
PD, such as Boxing, Tai chi, Cycling, etc., but the most important form is the
one that individuals will actually do and enjoy! If you take away anything from
this blog, I hope you remember to just keep moving!- and don’t do it for me, do
it for your BRAIN!
Want to learn more about exercising for brain health? Check us out at www.reactivept.com.
Want to learn more about exercising for brain health? Check us out at www.reactivept.com.
References:
1.
Nudo, R.J., et al., Neural substrates for the effects of
rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science,
1996. 272(5269): p. 1791-4.
2.
Petzinger, G.M., et al., Exercise-enhanced neuroplasticity
targeting motor and cognitive circuitry in Parkinson's disease. Lancet
Neurol, 2013. 12(7): p. 716-26.
3.
Plautz, E.J., G.W. Milliken, and R.J. Nudo, Effects of repetitive
motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of
use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem, 2000. 74(1): p. 27-55.
Comments
Post a Comment